Good day community) Since the Agoric company is considered an open organization, transparent and involved in the development of the community. I think it is right to ask to make the addresses of the following company participants open -
DCF address:
Agoric OpCo address:
Dean Tribble address:
Mark S. Miller address:
Michael Jablon address:
If you have something to add, copy the addresses written above and add your options.
Thanks for your question. Agoric and DCF, value transparency in governance processes and community participation â but that doesnât mean itâs a free-for-all when it comes to private information. âOpenâ does not equate to unrestricted access to individual identities, wallet addresses, or internal operations.
Asking for the personal wallet addresses of contributors or employees crosses an important boundary. Itâs also a red flag in any decentralized community, as such requests can signal intent to surveil, target, or intimidate. Unless an address is publicly tied to a governance role or voluntarily disclosed, that information remains private â as it should in any ethical system.
We encourage curiosity, but also respectful engagement that builds trust â not undermines it. If you have a specific reason for requesting this information, feel free to clarify.
As DCF is non profit organisation with focus on Agoric community support it has to be open and public and, on my opinion, it means share with community their wallet address.
DCF supports Interchain Protocol and Tribbles memes and spend money ( sell BLD) on these community driven projects.
Community has to know how much and the best way and as the first step: share address.
We know that DCF received 100 million BLD from Agoric OpCo for developing community activities.
Letâs community be engaged in it!
I belong to the category of those who suffered the most from the companyâs ill-considered actions since the beginning of ISO bld.
If a company positions itself as open to society, then in my opinion there should be transparency.
DCF address:
Agori OpCo address:
These are the companyâs wallets -
and you say that they should not be traced by the community either?
So what right does decentralization have then?
Support and strengthen my faith.
Letâs talk about my experiences.
In my opinion, there is an active sale of tokens. And if these addresses were transparent, the Community would look through them and if there would be no active sales from these wallets, this would strengthen confidence and faith in the company.
BUT after hearing your answer , indignation builds up in me and uncertainty appears . Please think about it and discuss this answer in your circle. The fate of the interaction between the community and the company will depend on this.
@dtribble Will you give the community the ability to see the companyâs actions?
Dean is board member of the DCF and Zaki Manian too.
So I hope they can help with this question ( share DCF wallet address).
And even more. Will be very nice to see from their side short analysis: how much DCF spent BLD each year and on what purposes.
Itâs a not issue to find out what DCF wallet is:
agoric1euw2t0lxgeerlpj0tcy77f9syrmgx26ehdx3sq
It was probably 100 million BLD on this wallet in 2022.
It is only 51 million BLD on this wallet in April 2025.
Congrats. Sold a lot.
And now as 51 m BLD equals 1 million dollars itâs clear why you want to shut down Inter Protocol.
As you shared on community call it costs 1 million dollars per year on support IST and you have only 1 million as for today on your balance. Last one million.
And of course, better to share your wallet address to community, than to read my assumptions here.
One of the Agoric OpCo wallets
I am sure that it is DCF wallet. I have source, where i found it.
What wallet address on your opinion belong DCF?
I think we donât need to guess.
This information is in the companyâs power
If DCF doesnât share their wallet address we can make guess, what it is.
And if you commented that this wallet address belong to Agoric UpCo just share why do you think so.
We are here to share our thoughts.
If they are confident in their digital protection: SES â Secure EcmaScript. ZOE.
They will show these addresses =)
Hi everyone, I hope you are doing well.
The question is legitimate, and not accepting to answer favorably is also legitimate. However, if the question is asked, itâs because the AGORIC team must take this into consideration in the future. We are all together, and personally, I truly believe in what AGORIC offers as solutions. It even made me want to learn programming in Javascript because the perspectives are limitless, not only in interoperability but also between web2 and web3.
What you asked for is one point among many others, but I donât think the price of BLD has decreased due to massive sales by the team; itâs imposed by the market, and we are all responsible for our actions. Large-scale projects have suffered enormous drops even when the focus was on incentives. We must note that good things take time to mature. I am neither for nor against; Iâm just saying that the REAL solution wouldnât solely lie in this transparency. I also emphasize that past decisions are by no means bad and that the decrease in the price of the BLD token is just due to a cycle that is precisely coming to an end. Thank you for asking this question.
Friendly, NEM0
What you say is exclusively your opinion.
Transparency of these addresses would give more confidence and desire to further store our assets, as well as recommendations to our acquaintances and friends.
Think carefully, looking at the schedule from 2022 to 2025⌠Would you recommend this project to your loved ones?
Letâs be honest - of course No.
This system shows incorrect actions on the part of the management and attitude to tokenomics - Now we see not Decentralization⌠But complete centralization.
The community has become very small.
We need to restore trust - and this is the role of the management. The management, in my eyes, is not doing this yet, relying again only on technology.
âIndeed, what youâre saying is true. We can meet halfway, we can also request a retrospective financial report and understand how the treasury has been managed, which might explain why certain decisions were made. Being transparent will only be beneficial both for the project and for the community. On the other hand, I understand that one might answer ânoâ in a âpartialâ way to this request. The ball is in their court. Letâs be patient and remain confident.â
Do you want to see something that will make you inspired? Thatâs what I want.
And in response I see and hear silence.
Let me now tell you truthfully and honestly, based on personal experience and vision of the relationship, a statement:
Hey - Yachia â complimenting me will get you EVERYWHERE. 
We appreciate your (very) active participation in the community. Please donât take it personally if Dean doesnât reply to messages. One must keep in mind that he is the CEO of a company, and his time is better served focused on developing the future of Agoric. You might imagine the time it would take if he were to answer each @dean ping on socials. Antman, Miguel, and the mods absorb the information and relay it back to Dean. He is aware of and takes seriously all of the posts. You are being heard. I guarantee that. His recent Open Letter post to this forum was, in part, a way to indirectly address many of your, and other community members, questions and concerns.
I hope that helps.