# SFS for Osmosis IST/OSMO Pool **URL:** \ **Category:** Inter Protocol\ **Tags:** inter-protocol, incentives\ **Created:** [April 1, 2023, 12:14am UTC](https://community.agoric.com/t/sfs-for-osmosis-ist-osmo-pool/237 "2023-04-01T00:14:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![JD-Agoric](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.agoric.com/jd-agoric/32/113_2.png) [@JD-Agoric](https://community.agoric.com/u/JD-Agoric)\ **Post date:** [April 3, 2023, 4:50pm UTC](https://community.agoric.com/t/sfs-for-osmosis-ist-osmo-pool/237/2 "2023-04-03T16:50:22Z")
Thanks for starting this discussion here! Looking forward to seeing comments and feedback from other community members. To start off by building on your comment [here](https://community.agoric.com/t/external-incentives-for-osmosis-pools/232/2) I gathered some data on other SFS pools. Focusing on stablecoins IST:OSMO is 3rd behind USDC and DAI respectively, but has more liquidity than USDT:OSMO (though USDT has higher 24hr volume). IST has more liquidity than 10 SFS pools and higher 24hr volume than 8 of those. Based on this observation there looks to be a strong case to be made for IST:OSMO to be supported as an Osmosis SFS pool. Pool data (approx. at the time of writing) | Pool | Liquidity | Volume (24 hrs) | | --- | --- | --- | | USDC:OSMO | $16,317,777 | $1,895,782 | | DAI:OSMO | $2,746,878 | $101,250 | | **IST:OSMO** | **$1,075,375** | **$26,361** | | wMATIC:OSMO | $639,131 | $15,965 | | REGEN:OSMO | $612,677 | $11,205 | | wBNB:OSMO | $533,749 | $17,339 | | wDOT:OSMO | $532,195 | $8346 | | **BLD:OSMO** | **$512,278** | **$20,061** | | NGM:OSMO | $374,988 | $9190 | | USDT:OSMO | $365,476 | $47,113 | | wAVAX:OSMO | $326,007 | $10,799 | | HUAHUA:OSMO | $250,202 | $13,748 | | wFTM:OSMO | $210,960 | $8725 | | XPRT:OSMO | $184,780 | $28,522 | _Edit: added BLD:OSMO pool to chart_ --- _[View the full topic](https://community.agoric.com/t/sfs-for-osmosis-ist-osmo-pool/237)._