# External incentives for Osmosis Pools

**URL:** <https://community.agoric.com/t/external-incentives-for-osmosis-pools/232>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [March 28, 2023, 2:45pm UTC](https://community.agoric.com/t/external-incentives-for-osmosis-pools/232 "2023-03-28T14:45:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedRabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.agoric.com/redrabbit/32/102_2.png) [@RedRabbit](https://community.agoric.com/u/RedRabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 1, 2023, 1:00pm UTC](https://community.agoric.com/t/external-incentives-for-osmosis-pools/232/2 "2023-04-01T13:00:07Z")

</div>

I personally believe that if proposals to incentivize the BLD/OSMO and or the IST/OSMO pools, parallel Osmosis governance proposals to enable superfluid staking (SFS) status and match the BLD external incentives should be voted on as well.

The BLD/OSMO currently has:  
a) more liquidity and a higher seven day trading volume than SFS pools like DOT/OSMO, WAVAX/OSMO, WFTM.OSMO, and XPRT/OSMO;  
b) more liquidity than SFS pool HUAHUA/OSMO;  
c) roughly the same amount of liquidity and seven day trading volume as SFS pools WBNB/OSMO and WMATIC/OSMO.

The IST/OSMO pool has more liquidity than the USDT/OSMO pool, which Osmosis governance is currently voting on to enable SFS status and roughly the same seven day volume.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.agoric.com/t/external-incentives-for-osmosis-pools/232)._